What This Template Is For
A competitive analysis is the foundation of informed product strategy. Without a clear picture of what alternatives exist, how they are positioned, and where they fall short, you are making roadmap decisions in the dark. This template provides a repeatable, structured framework for analyzing competitors across six dimensions: company overview, product features, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, market positioning, and strategic implications for your own product.
Use this template to build a living competitive intelligence document that informs roadmap prioritization, positioning decisions, pricing strategy, and sales enablement.
When to Use This Template
Important: A competitive analysis is a snapshot. Markets shift. Set a calendar reminder to update this document quarterly, or whenever a competitor makes a significant move (funding round, major launch, acquisition).
Step-by-Step Instructions
Step 1: Identify Your Competitors (10 minutes)
List 4-6 competitors across three categories:
Do not analyze more than 6 competitors in depth. Focus beats breadth.
Step 2: Gather Intelligence (20 minutes per competitor)
For each competitor, collect data from these sources:
Step 3: Fill In the Template Sections (30 minutes)
Work through each section below. Do not aim for perfection on the first pass. Capture what you know, flag what you need to research further, and iterate.
Step 4: Synthesize Strategic Implications (10 minutes)
The most important section is the last one. After analyzing individual competitors, step back and answer: What does this mean for us? Where should we compete, where should we differentiate, and where should we avoid head-to-head battles?
The Competitive Analysis Template
Section 1: Competitor Overview
| Dimension | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C | Competitor D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company name | [Name] | [Name] | [Name] | [Name] |
| Type | Direct / Indirect / Potential | |||
| Founded | [Year] | |||
| Headquarters | [City, Country] | |||
| Funding / Revenue | [Total funding or est. ARR] | |||
| Headcount | [Approx. employees] | |||
| Target market | [Primary ICP] | |||
| Core value prop | [One sentence] | |||
| Key differentiator | [What they claim sets them apart] |
Section 2: Product Feature Comparison Matrix
List 15-20 features that matter to your buyers. Rate each competitor (and yourself) using this scale:
| Feature | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C | Competitor D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Feature 1] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 2] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 3] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 4] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 5] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 6] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 7] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 8] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 9] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
| [Feature 10] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] | [Rating] |
Feature parity gaps (features where competitors are Strong and you are Weak/None):
Your advantages (features where you are Strong and competitors are Weak/None):
Section 3: Pricing Comparison
| Dimension | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C | Competitor D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | [Per seat / Usage / Flat / Freemium] | ||||
| Free tier | [Yes/No -- what's included] | ||||
| Entry price | [$X/mo] | ||||
| Mid-tier price | [$X/mo] | ||||
| Enterprise price | [$X/mo or Custom] | ||||
| Annual discount | [%] | ||||
| Key gating feature | [What feature drives upgrades] | ||||
| Contract requirements | [Monthly / Annual / Multi-year] |
Pricing insights:
Section 4: SWOT Analysis per Competitor
Repeat this section for each competitor.
Competitor A: [Name]
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| [Strength 1] | [Weakness 1] |
| [Strength 2] | [Weakness 2] |
| [Strength 3] | [Weakness 3] |
| Opportunities (for them) | Threats (to them) |
|---|---|
| [Opportunity 1] | [Threat 1] |
| [Opportunity 2] | [Threat 2] |
| [Opportunity 3] | [Threat 3] |
What they will likely do next quarter: [Your prediction based on signals]
Competitor B: [Name]
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|
| [Strength 1] | [Weakness 1] |
| [Strength 2] | [Weakness 2] |
| [Strength 3] | [Weakness 3] |
| Opportunities (for them) | Threats (to them) |
|---|---|
| [Opportunity 1] | [Threat 1] |
| [Opportunity 2] | [Threat 2] |
| [Opportunity 3] | [Threat 3] |
What they will likely do next quarter: [Your prediction based on signals]
Section 5: Market Positioning Map
Plot each competitor (and yourself) along two axes that matter most to your buyers. Common axis pairs include:
High [Axis Y Label]
|
|
Competitor B * | * Your Product
|
|
-------------------------+-------------------------
|
|
Competitor C * | * Competitor A
|
|
Low [Axis Y Label]
Low [Axis X Label] High [Axis X Label]
Axes chosen: [Axis X] vs. [Axis Y]
Rationale: [Why these dimensions matter to buyers]
Your positioning narrative: [One paragraph describing where you sit and why that position is defensible]
Section 6: Strategic Implications
This is the most important section. Synthesize everything above into actionable strategy.
Where to Compete Head-to-Head
Where to Differentiate
Where to Avoid
Risks to Monitor
Recommended Actions for Next Quarter
Filled-Out Example: Project Management SaaS
Competitor Overview (Example)
| Dimension | Acme PM | TaskFlow | PlanBoard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company name | Acme PM | TaskFlow | PlanBoard |
| Type | Direct | Direct | Indirect |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 | 2016 |
| Funding / Revenue | $45M Series B | $12M Series A | ~$30M ARR (bootstrapped) |
| Headcount | ~250 | ~80 | ~200 |
| Target market | Mid-market SaaS teams | Startups and SMBs | Agencies and creative teams |
| Core value prop | All-in-one project and resource management | Simple, fast task tracking | Visual project planning for creative workflows |
| Key differentiator | Built-in time tracking and resource allocation | Speed and simplicity | Template library and client-facing views |
Feature Comparison (Example)
| Feature | Our Product | Acme PM | TaskFlow | PlanBoard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kanban boards | Strong | Strong | Strong | Strong |
| Gantt charts | Adequate | Strong | None | Strong |
| Time tracking | None | Strong | Weak | Adequate |
| Custom fields | Strong | Strong | Adequate | Weak |
| Reporting dashboards | Strong | Adequate | Weak | Adequate |
| API / Integrations | Strong | Adequate | Strong | Weak |
| Mobile app | Weak | Adequate | Strong | Adequate |
| Client portal | None | None | None | Strong |
Key gap: We lack time tracking, which is a strong selling point for Acme PM in the mid-market. We should evaluate whether to build or integrate.
Key advantage: Our API and custom fields are significantly stronger. This matters for teams with complex workflows and existing tool ecosystems.
Tips for Getting the Most Out of This Template
Key Takeaways
About This Template
Created by: Tim Adair
Last Updated: 2/8/2026
Version: 1.0.0
License: Free for personal and commercial use